From: BLUST, STEPHEN M <SB8927@att.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 07:12
To: Ven Sampath; Håkan Ohlsén; kjwee56@hotmail.com; Sergio
Buonomo
Cc: werner.mohr@nokia.com; wanyi@caict.ac.cn; Jose Costa;
Nigel.Jefferies@huawei.com; chairman@wwrf.ch; director.cc@tcoe.in;
satoh@arib.or.jp; seongjun@korea.ac.kr; yongjun.chung@tta.or.kr;
tmlin@itri.com; chsieh@itri.org.tw; adrian.scrase@etsi.org; mdahab@aast.edu;
mmoghazi@ntra.gov.eg; imt2020@5gindiaforum.in; Farrokh Khatibi; Steve Barclay;
dsono@dtps.gov.za; Usman Aliyu; A.K. Mittal; Yoshio Honda; serge.bertuzzo@bell.ca
Subject: RE: Method of referencing the candidate input submissions
Attachments: Summary of IMT-2020 Documents (through WP 5D Meeting #33)
Organized by Category (SMB V1 12-19-19).docx
All:
In this email I provide a summary listing of the IMT-2020 documents by “category”(for information) as well as address the question raised.
While referencing just the submission IMT-2020 history documents as noted by Ven is not incorrect, it might not, in the context of Step 4, provide the most complete and comprehensive reference.
The most complete reference that incorporates the “submission(s) history” (by reference), the “evaluation observations history” (by reference) and the “acknowledgement history” are the Acknowledgement IMT-2020 documents.
Using the Acknowledgement IMT-2020 document incorporate a complete view, all in one reference document, especially in the context of Step 4 activities.
So in answer to this very pertinent question, it is suggested to use the following for referring to the submissions (particularly in the title or in the subject context of an evaluation report) as we continue through Step 4:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
|
Number |
Title |
|
[ 19 ] |
Acknowledgement
of candidate RIT submission from TSDSI under Step 3 of the IMT-2020 process
|
|
[ 18 ] |
Acknowledgement
of candidate RIT submission from Nufront under Step 3 of the IMT-2020 process
|
|
[ 17 ] |
Acknowledgement
of candidate SRIT submission from ETSI (TC DECT) and DECT Forum under Step 3
of the IMT-2020 process |
|
Acknowledgement
of candidate RIT submission from Korea (Republic of) under Step 3 of the
IMT-2020 process |
|
|
Acknowledgement
of candidate RIT submission from China (People's Republic of) under Step 3 of
the IMT-2020 process |
|
|
Acknowledgement
of candidate RIT submission from 3GPP proponent Step 3 of the IMT-2020
process |
|
|
Acknowledgement
of candidate SRIT submission from 3GPP proponent under Step 3 of the IMT-2020
process |
Of course, if specific mention in the evaluation work and or evaluation reports needs to be made to the specific input submission and/or the specific evaluation observation this could be utilized depending on the context as follows:
SUBMISSIONS
|
Number |
Title |
|
[ 7 ] |
Submission
received for proposals of candidate radio interface technologies from
proponent 'TSDSI' under Step 3 of the IMT-2020 Process |
|
[ 6 ] |
Submission
received for proposals of Candidate Radio Interface Technologies from
Proponent 'ETSI' (TC DECT), and 'DECT Forum' under Step 3 of the IMT-2020
process |
|
[ 5 ] |
Submission
received for proposals of candidate radio interface technologies from
proponent 'China' under Step 3 of the IMT-2020 process |
|
[ 4 ] |
Submission
received for proposals of candidate radio interface technologies from
proponent 'Korea' under Step 3 of the IMT-2020 process |
|
[ 3 ] |
Submission
received for proposals of candidate radio interface technologies from
proponent '3GPP' under Step 3 of the IMT-2020 process |
EVALUATION
OBSERVATIONS
|
Number |
Title |
|
[ 28 ] |
Observations
of SWG Evaluation (Proponent TSDSI) - IMT-2020 submission in Document 5D/1301
(Proponent TSDSI) |
|
[ 27 ] |
Observation
of SWG Evaluation (Proponent Nufront) - IMT-2020 submission in Document
5D/1238 (Proponent Nufront) |
|
[ 26 ] |
Obsrvations
of SWG Evaluation (Proponents ETSI (TC DECT) & DECT Forum) - IMT-2020
submission in Documents 5D/1230 and 5D/1253 (Proponents ETSI (TC DECT) &
DECT Forum |
|
Observations
of SWG Evaluation (Proponent Korea) - IMT-2020 submission in Document 5D/1233
(Proponent Korea) |
|
|
Observations
of SWG Evaluation (Proponent China) - IMT-2020 submission in Document 5D/1268
(Proponent China) |
|
|
Observations
of SWG Evaluation (3GPP Proponent) - IMT-2020 submission in Documents 5D/1215,
5D/1216 and 5D/1217 (3GPP Proponent ) |
And from a process perspective we have these IMT-2020 documents
PROCESS
|
Number |
Title |
|
A
proposal for a way forward on IMT-2020 submissions |
|
|
Detailed
schedule for finalization of the first release of new Recommendation ITU-R
M.[IMT-2020.SPECS] "Detailed specifications of the terrestrial radio
interfaces of International Mobile Telecommunications-2020 (IMT-2020)"
|
|
|
Process
and the use of Global Core Specification (GCS), references and related
certifications in conjunction with Recommendation ITU-R M.[IMT-2020.SPECS]
|
|
|
[ 2 ] |
Submission,
evaluation process and consensus building for IMT-2020 |
|
IMT-2020
background |
And to round out this summary:
IEG EVALUATION
REPORTS
|
Number |
Title |
|
Evaluation
report received from Africa Evaluation Group (AEG) on the candidate IMT-2020
radio interface technology proposals |
|
|
Evaluation
Report received from 5G Infrastructure Association on the candidate IMT-2020
radio interface technology proposals |
|
|
Evaluation
Report received from the Fifth Generation Mobile Communications Promotion
Forum (5GMF) on the candidate IMT-2020 radio interface technology proposals
|
|
|
Evaluation
Report received from TTA SPG33 on candidate IMT-2020 radio interface
technology proposals |
|
|
Evaluation
Report received from the Canadian Evaluation Group (CEG) on the candidate
IMT-2020 radio interface technology proposals |
|
|
Evaluation
Report received from ATIS WTSC IMT-2020 IEG on the candidate IMT-2020 radio
interface technology proposals |
|
|
[ 11 ] |
Evaluation
Report received from 5G India Forum (5GIF) on the candidate IMT-2020 radio
interface technology proposals |
|
[ 10 ] |
Evaluation
Report received from Chinese Evaluation Group (CHEG) on the candidate
IMT-2020 radio interface technology proposals |
|
[ 9 ] |
Evaluation
Report received from Telecom Centres of Excellence, India (TCOE) on the
candidate IMT-2020 radio interface technology proposals |
|
[ 8 ] |
Evaluation
Report received from TPCEG on the candidate IMT-2020 radio interface
technology proposals |
Regards.
Stephen BLUST
From: Ven Sampath <ven.sampath@ericsson.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 1:41 PM
To: BLUST, STEPHEN M <SB8927@att.com>; Håkan Ohlsén
<hakan.ohlsen@ericsson.com>; kjwee56@hotmail.com; Sergio Buonomo
<sergio.buonomo@itu.int>
Cc: werner.mohr@nokia.com; wanyi@caict.ac.cn; Jose Costa
<jose.costa@ericsson.com>; Nigel.Jefferies@huawei.com; chairman@wwrf.ch;
director.cc@tcoe.in; satoh@arib.or.jp; seongjun@korea.ac.kr;
yongjun.chung@tta.or.kr; tmlin@itri.com; chsieh@itri.org.tw;
adrian.scrase@etsi.org; mdahab@aast.edu; mmoghazi@ntra.gov.eg; imt2020@5gindiaforum.in;
Farrokh Khatibi <fkhatibi@qti.qualcomm.com>; Steve Barclay
<sbarclay@atis.org>; dsono@dtps.gov.za; Usman Aliyu
<ualiyu@ncc.gov.ng>; A.K. Mittal <akmittal@tsdsi.in>; Yoshio Honda
<yoshio.honda@ericsson.com>; serge.bertuzzo@bell.ca
Subject: Method of referencing the candidate input submissions
Dear leadership team of WP 5D,
My apologies if you’ve already answered this question – I appear to have forgotten the answer!
At the concluding plenary of the recent 5D meeting, the CEG asked which of the IMT-2020 documents would be the correct one for referencing as the “official” submission? Is it the history documents – which contain all of the “submissions received” from the proponents or is it the “acknowledgement” documents – which reference specific submissions only from the proponents?
That is, should the IEGs be referring to docs:
- IMT-2020/3(Rev4) – for
the 3GPP proponent?
- IMT-2020/4(Rev4) – for
the proponent from Korea?
- IMT-2020/5(Rev4) – for
the proponent from China?
- IMT-2020/6(Rev4) – for
the ETSI-DECT proponent?
- IMT-2020/7(Rev4) – for
the TSDSI proponent?
- IMT-2020/12(Rev1) – for
the Nufront proponent?
Thank you very much for your clarification. Copying other IEGs so we all remain synchronised.
Regards,
Ven
Ven Sampath
Phone: +15143798348
Mobile: +15149926354
Ericsson
8275 Route Transcanadienne
H4S 0B6,Saint-Laurent,
Quebec
Canada