From: Steve Barclay <sbarclay@atis.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 14:33
To: werner.mohr@nokia.com; wanyi@caict.ac.cn; Ven Sampath; Jose
Costa; Nigel.Jefferies@huawei.com; director.cc@tcoe.in; satoh@arib.or.jp;
seongjun@korea.ac.kr; yongjun.chung@tta.or.kr; tmlin@itri.com;
chsieh@itri.org.tw; adrian.scrase@etsi.org; mdahab@aast.edu;
mmoghazi@ntra.gov.eg; imt2020@5gindiaforum.in
Cc: Steve Barclay; Katie Bagwill; Buonomo, Sergio; Farrokh
Khatibi
Subject: Request for TSDSI IMT-2020 Proponent Evaluation Results
Importance: High
IMT-2020 Independent
Evaluation Groups (IEGs):
On behalf of the ATIS WTSC
IEG, please be aware that the following information/request has been posted
to the “IMT-2020 Evaluation Groups discussion area” and I have transmitted the
same to the TSDSI IMT-2020 proponent:
The ATIS WTSC Independent
Evaluation Group (IEG) reviewed the submission from the TSDSI proponent to WP5D
(5D/1231), which is now incorporated into
document IMT-2020/19, the "Acknowledgement of
candidate RIT submission from TSDSI under Step 3 of the IMT-2020
process".
ATIS WTSC IEG has discussed
the open issue related to the maximum output power from user equipment (UE). It
is our understanding that power class 23dBm as defined in Report ITU-R M.2412
corresponds to a UE maximum transmit power of 23 dBm. However,
the submission from TSDSI proponent contains some self-evaluation results and
assumptions using a value of 26 dBm as the max UE output power for eMBB-Dense
Urban and Rural simulations, as well as link budgets.
It is possible to use 26 dBm
as an additional methodology; however, in order to fulfill the
M.2412 requirements, the TSDSI proponent must provide evaluation results
assuming a maximum UE output power of 23 dBm.
Best regards,
Steve
|
|
|
